I
had never really read any like Maggie Nelson’s Bluets before. The form and style are very unique and unlike a
traditional novel. I thought though that it allowed her to do a lot more than a
traditional novel would. They almost acted like individual chapters, each with
its own short section about her experience with this color. This gave her the
ability to jump around between different stories and moments, which to me gave
it almost a conversational feel. Even though there are so many different
stories and not really one traditionally consistent storyline, she repeatedly
comes back to certain stories as if she was just continuing from where she had
left off. This too made it feel more conversational. It felt less like I was
reading her words, but she was telling me her own words, which strengthens her
connection to the story and the color blue. When I first learned the story
behind the novel, I did not fully understand what it would be about, but
Nelson’s style allows for such an abstract story to be told in a both
interesting and reasonable way. If she had written this a traditional novel, I
feel it would not be as interesting. These short snippets to story make
something as vague and abstract as the color blue an enjoyable read.
Something that Nelson talked about
throughout her novel, Bluets, was her process of writing it. While she did not
come out and explicitly say the process she uses, she talks about what went
into her writing and things that influenced her. This added to the
conversational feel that I had talked about earlier. The short snippets rather
than long paragraphs made me feel as though she was writing the novel over a
long period of time fitting sections into her schedule when she had time. I can
almost imagine her randomly pulling out her notebook in the middle of the day
to add a number to the novel. I feel this way because of the seemingly random
aspects that flow to make her novel. While each piece is different from the
most part, they all come together in the end to create a full story, like she
had had the beginning, middle, and end constructed in her head, but wanted to
display the story in a less conventional way. She seems like the type of person
that does not like the conventional, which is evident in both her style and
form of writing along with her storyline itself, one that takes something very
abstract and vague and makes it unique.
No comments:
Post a Comment