Pg 3-4,9, 12, 23, 28, 48
The propositions’ back and forth nature creates a
conversational dialogue throughout the entirety of Bluets. In some verses it
comes across as Nelson’s free-flowing train of thought as she speaks on a
variety of subjects. Surrounding the nature of loving the color blue, Nelson
proposes “And what kind of madness is it anyway, to be in love with something
constitutionally incapable of loving you back?” She answers her own question,
or provides a different narrative, in the following prose, “Are you sure-one
would like to ask-that it cannot love you back?” (15). Content arranged in this
manner emphasizes the philosophical reasoning one would be grappling with, when
attempting to explain their love for an unrequited person, object, or in this
case, color.
I imagine Nelson took her time in compiling Bluets. The compositions detail very
different life experiences that I’m sure spanned across a year, if not more.
Whether it’s the arrangement of the content or Nelson’s flighty manner of
story-telling, it seems as if the narrative spans a long period of time,
transcending a linear plot. Although initially it may seem jarring, the plot
flows seamlessly from one present-day experience, to a memory, to a desire that
can only be imagined in the far-off future. The form of numbered, short
snippets permits this maneuvering of space and time.
From the narrative presented, Nelson seems to question
almost everything. There are no facts, but only starting points for why, how,
etc. She also seems to be very detail oriented due to her graphic, descriptive,
and sensual word choices. To view one
color so passionately and deeply displays the ability to creatively notice
distinctions in one color scheme, whereas others may only view it as that.
Due to the philosophical nature, Nelson also creates a
melancholy persona. She never holds onto something that is concrete or factual
and is questioning a majority of what she comes across. Instead of grasping
what is presented to her, Nelson seems quite lost in her search of “blue” or
whatever she is searching for. In this way, she embodies the strangest paradox
of both fleeting and questioning, questioning but not thinking, searching, but
also finding. It’s difficult to describe now that I’m viewing her writing from
this mindset, but Nelson clearly infused Bluets with hearty potions of her own
life.
No comments:
Post a Comment